Il presente contributo fa parte del volume collettaneo “La procedura penale “riformata”. Una lettura per gli studenti”, a cura di L. Marafioti-G. Paolozzi-F. Centorame-G. Fiorelli, edito da Giappichelli, Torino, 2023. Si ringrazia l’Editore per la pubblicazione anche in questa Rivista.
Pur essendo il frutto di una riflessione condivisa delle Autrici, Arianna Festinese ha redatto il § 1, Federica Centorame i §§ 2-3-4.
SOMMARIO 1. “Essere” e “dover essere” del paradigma riparativo. – 2. Combinazioni efficienti fra procedura giudiziaria e mediazione penale. – 3. Fragili barriere al travaso di conoscenze riservate dalla sede riparativa al contesto processuale. – 4. Falle d’incostituzionalità nella riparazione dell’offesa per volere del giudice.
Intersections between Restorative justice and Criminal trial in the reformed legal framework
ABSTRACT
After highlighting the shortcomings of the current criminal system that led to the introduction of a new discipline, the article examines the intersections between Restorative justice and Criminal trial as provided for by the Legislative Decree 150/2022. The objective is to prevent the new paradigm form undermining the fundamental guarantees of a fair trial. In fact, Restorative justice when combined with Criminal trial may diminish the cogency of several constitutional principles such as the presumption of innocence, the inviolability of the defence and the impartiality of the judge. On the basis of this approach, only a strict separation of the two ontologically different cognitive platforms can save Restorative justice regulation from the risk of being unconstitutional.
KEYWORDS
D.lgs. 150/2022 – Restorative justice – Criminal trial – Constitutional principles